Power Games

Appeals court denies Biden bid to block release of tapes with biographer, for now

A federal appeals panel refused, for now, to stop the Justice Department from handing redacted tapes and transcripts of Joe Biden’s conversations with his biographer to the Heritage Foundation. The court paused the order until August to allow more appeals.

Why this matters: In a 2-1 decision, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected Biden's attempt to stop the Heritage Foundation from getting the material.

What happened

A federal appeals panel denied former President Joe Biden’s bid to block release of taped talks with his biographer. The court said Biden did not show the recordings must be kept secret. The decision is stayed until August 3 so more appeals can move forward.

The material dates to 2016–2017 when Biden met his biographer for a memoir. The Justice Department first withheld the files under Freedom of Information Act exemptions. The files later became a target after a special counsel’s report referenced those conversations.

Who wins here

The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, gains access if lower courts clear the way. Media outlets and political opponents also gain by getting material to shape public stories. The Justice Department and the new administration control whether and how the material gets handed over.

Biden, as a private citizen, loses some secrecy. He asked the court to block release, saying these were private talks collected during an investigation that found no charges.

How the play works

This is a legal power play over public records. The Heritage Foundation used the Freedom of Information Act to force release. Courts weigh FOIA rules against privacy and investigatory exemptions.

The D.C. Circuit panel looked for a legal reason to stop disclosure. It found Biden did not show he was likely to win. But the court paused its order so higher courts can answer remaining questions.

Why it matters

Release would give political players fresh material about a former president’s memory and decision-making. That can shape news cycles, campaign messages, and congressional hearings. The public will see redacted transcripts or audio and judge for themselves.

The case also sets a rule for where presidential privacy ends under FOIA. That matters for future requests about private talks collected during probes.

What to watch next

Watch for an appeal to the full D.C. Circuit or the Supreme Court. Check for new rulings before August 3 that lift or extend the stay. Also watch whether the Justice Department actually turns over the files and what it redacts.

Track who files briefs and what parts of the recordings are released. Those moves will show who gains leverage next.

LensPower Games
TypeReporting
PublishedJuly 21, 2026
Read time3 min read
SourceCBS News
Where the facts come from

The facts in this story were first reported by CBS News. What you're reading here is our take on what it means for power and for you.

Read the original at CBS News
Related topics

More stories on these topics

news analysispower consolidationmediawhite housecongress
Subscribe for moreExplore this lensBrowse all issues